They just love to demonize our heroes. Take for example Rafael Palmeiro, whose face you can find on the front page of any sports web site for his recent steroid suspension.
I think one reason a few sports writers are out to get these athletes or demonize their alleged "cheating" is because it makes them feel better.
Jay Mariotti probably thinks that he could hit 66 homeruns like Sammy if he had only taken steroids when he was in little league.
Bob Ryan probably thinks that he could have had 3000 hits and 500+ homeruns if he were only to have taken steroids.
These guys have this mentality that they must bring these guys down to their level, but the problem is with or without steroids the accomplishments of these athletes are amazing.
A lot of the writer's like to draw the comparisons to track and field, bicycling, and other endurance sports. The reason the drug testing in those sports is so strict and intrusive is because steroids and other performance enhancing drugs actually have a noticeable impact. Those sports do not take the kind of hand-eye coordination and athleticism that hitting a baseball does.
Steroids do not help you hit a baseball, period end of story.
Up next... a discussion of why sportswriters are only concerned about steroids? What about Curt Schilling and his painkiller usage in his "heroic performance" in the World Series? Also, a look back at cheating in past days, Hank Aaron's supposed amphetamine use, Babe Ruth's alleged use of cork, and the Spit ball or scuffed ball. |